“The jury at Kyle Rittenhouse’s murder trial deliberated a full day on Tuesday without reaching a verdict… Rittenhouse, 18, faces life in prison if convicted as charged for using an AR-style semi-automatic rifle to kill two men and wound a third during a night of protests against racial injustice in Kenosha in the summer of 2020… Rittenhouse testified he acted in self-defense, while prosecutors argued he provoked the violence.” AP News
The right argues that Rittenhouse has a strong self-defense claim, and criticizes local authorities for failing to maintain order during the protests preceding the shooting.
“Rittenhouse’s defense has made a strong case… The prosecutors argue that Rittenhouse provoked Rosenbaum and thus should lose his self-defense privilege. They claim a blurry drone video depicts Rittenhouse pointing his rifle at Ziminski right before the initial chase, an illegal act that in turn provoked Rosenbaum. (The defense counters that, if you interpret the video that way, Rittenhouse is aiming the gun left-handed, when in fact he’s right-handed.)…
“To prove provocation under Wisconsin law, however, prosecutors have to show either that (a) Rittenhouse provoked someone with the intent of using the provoked behavior as an excuse to shoot them, of which there is no evidence; or (b) that he did something unlawful to provoke an attack and then subsequently failed to retreat to the extent possible before using lethal force…
“The fact that Rittenhouse ran away from Rosenbaum, fired only when Rosenbaum closed in, and ran away from the later mob as well before falling down, is solid evidence against that theory, even if we assume that Rittenhouse in fact pointed the gun as alleged. The prosecution had to argue, basically, that Rittenhouse should have done a better job of running away.”
Robert VerBruggen, National Review
“Fearing violence, Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers sent the National Guard in to Kenosha in advance of the jury verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. Wise enough — except that, if he’d had the guard out in force as soon as the riots started last year, there probably wouldn’t be a trial now. That is: If Kenosha hadn’t descended into chaos, the chances of such a deadly encounter ever happening would have been much diminished…
“When rioting starts to break out — whatever the cause and whether or not it sprang out of peaceful and legitimate protest — every authority’s only proper response is to shut it down, fast. That holds every bit as much for Kenosha on Aug. 25, 2020, as it does for DC on Jan. 6, 2021. There’s no excuse for the leaders in Portland, Minneapolis or Kenosha, who surrendered their cities to the mob. Because riots make it all too likely that people will be killed, and certain that innocents will be harmed.”
Editorial Board, New York Post
“Here’s the thing: The alternative to police is not social workers. It is not, in the long run, violence run wild, either. It is vigilantes and lynch mobs. Before we had professional police, there was always some form of state-sanctioned arm of the law. When the proper authorities fail to keep order, private citizens will one way or another take the law in their own hands…
“That’s what happened in California in the 1850s with the first ‘Vigilance Committees.’ It happened in the Wild West. It’s why Bernie Goetz carried a gun on the subway. It’s why Korean businessmen took up arms to defend their stores in the 1992 Los Angeles riots. It will always happen when government fails at its first duty…
“If you don’t want more Kyle Rittenhouses taking it upon themselves to hold back the forces of anarchy and ruin, you have to have responsible law enforcement ready and willing to do it. The people most upset at Rittenhouse are the ones who would put more of him on the streets.”
Dan McLaughlin, National Review
The left condemns Rittenhouse for inserting himself into a potentially dangerous situation, and worries about the consequences of widespread gun possession during protests.
The left condemns Rittenhouse for inserting himself into a potentially dangerous situation, and worries about the consequences of widespread gun possession during protests.
“Had Rittenhouse been Black, do you really think he’d be alive to stand trial right now? Somehow I strongly suspect that he might not have been taken into custody healthy and well. Jacob Blake, whose shooting prompted the Kenosha protests, certainly wasn’t. Blake was left paralyzed from the waist down after a white police officer shot him seven times in the back; charges were not filed against the police officer after video showed Blake had been armed with a knife…
“Rittenhouse did not find himself at the Kenosha protest by chance; he crossed state lines to attend. He obtained a semi-automatic weapon and brought it with him. He shot three people. While out on bail, he showed up at a bar in T-shirt that said ‘Free as Fuck,’ and took photos with members of the Proud Boys. Had he been Black, the conservative media would undoubtedly be treating him like a terrorist; instead, he’s being treated like a hero.”
Arwa Mahdawi, The Guardian
“Should Americans, including a then-17-year-old, be permitted to police the streets of a town in a neighboring state when law enforcement appears to some to be inadequate? Was Kyle Rittenhouse acting as a vigilante when he chose to arm himself and enter the fray of protestors and others, claiming his purpose was to protect property and provide first aid? Should this be legal if he was? Was Rittenhouse looking for trouble, and should this restrict his right to assert self-defense? Are we headed toward an America where openly armed political factions and protesters can roam the streets openly carrying AR-15s like militias in other lawless and war-torn countries?…
“Whether Rittenhouse is found guilty or innocent, one thing remains clear: The video footage introduced, mostly by the prosecution, depicts a frightening, dystopic view of Kenosha's streets that August evening… If the trial should send any message, let it not be to the public but to those who interpret how to apply the Second Amendment to the streets of America in the 21st century. Let's hope the Supreme Court justices now deciding whether it should be easier to carry weapons in heavily populated urban settings were tuned in to the Rittenhouse trial.”
Paul Callan, CNN
“Since January 2020, millions of Americans have assembled in public places to protest police brutality, systemic racism, and coronavirus protocols, among other things. A significant number of those protesters were confronted by counterprotesters visibly bearing firearms. In some of these cases, violence erupted. According to a new study by Everytown for Gun Safety and the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), one in six armed protests that took place from January 2020 through June 2021 turned violent or destructive, and one in 62 turned deadly…
“[Another] study found that participants were far less likely to attend a protest, carry a sign, vocalize their views, or bring children to protests if they knew firearms would be present… As courts and legislatures consider gun regulations, they ought to bear in mind not just the physical dangers of armed protests but also the social harms associated with them… People cannot freely exercise their speech rights when they fear for their lives.”
Diana Palmer and Timothy Zick, The Atlantic
41 times folks were caught carrying dogs in bags.
Bored Panda