“Vice President Kamala Harris [last] Thursday defended shifting away from some of her more liberal positions in her first major television interview of her presidential campaign, but insisted her ‘values have not changed’ even as she is ‘seeking consensus.’…
“Sitting with her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris was asked specifically about her reversals on banning fracking and decriminalizing illegal border crossings, positions she took during her last run for president. She confirmed she does not want to ban fracking, an energy extraction process key to the economy of swing-state Pennsylvania, and said there ‘should be consequence’ for people who cross the border without permission.” AP News
The left argues that Harris performed adequately.
“[CNN host Dana] Bash seemed a bit incredulous when she asked Harris, ‘You maintain that Bidenomics is a success?’ For the record, here are the most recent major economic readings in the US: Real GDP: Up 3.0%. Inflation: 1.9%. Unemployment: 4.3%. Real wages: up 0.7% annualized since start of year. Stock market: up 18% since start of year. Every one of these is either good or excellent. What's not to like?”
Kevin Drum, Jabberwocking
“[Harris] acknowledged that ‘prices, in particular for groceries, are still too high,’ and she mentioned her proposals to expand the child tax credit and subsidize first-time home buyers. She also listed a number of the Administration’s achievements, including capping the cost of insulin for seniors at thirty-five dollars a month, creating eight hundred thousand manufacturing jobs, and making the U.S. economy less dependent on global supply chains for basic needs.”
John Cassidy, New Yorker
“Her response [to questions about her shifting policy positions] was that her values have not changed but her experience as vice president has given her a different perspective and made her appreciate the importance of achieving consensus. You may not like that answer, but she was confident and unapologetic in explaining herself…
“Even as she projected strength and seriousness, Harris needed to give people a sense of her as a real person, to let them peek behind the curtain a bit. Her story about the morning that Biden called to tell her that he was stepping aside did this nicely. There were baby nieces and pancakes and bacon involved. What could be more American? Does Harris still have questions to answer and concerns to allay? Yep. The self-defining is not yet done. But this felt like a good first effort.”Michelle Cottle, New York Times
“There’s a difference between adjusting one’s views on a specific and frankly not-all-that-vital policy after learning more, as Harris has [with fracking], and speaking out of both sides of one’s mouth on some of the most fundamental issues voters must consider, as Trump and Vance often do. Trump has both bragged about ending the era of abortion rights in America and then saying he’ll be great for reproductive freedoms, while Vance has compared Trump to Hitler and then run alongside him.”
Jill Filipovic, Daily Beast
“What Harris’s opponents cast as ‘flip-flops’ — and, yes, she has changed her positions on, among other issues, fracking and aspects of immigration policy — are about more than, say, the urgent need to carry Pennsylvania. They also reflect a progressive movement that found a way during the Biden years to manage the trade-offs that progress requires…
“Some might call these shifts ‘selling out’ or, more blandly, ‘moving to the center.’ Neither formulation grasps one of the genuine achievements of Biden’s presidency: He created policy coalitions that brought center and left together on behalf of incremental but significant changes with an eye toward more progress down the road. Harris is now the standard-bearer for that approach.”
E.J. Dionne, Washington Post
The right is critical of Harris, arguing that she failed to explain her policy shifts.
The right is critical of Harris, arguing that she failed to explain her policy shifts.
“[Harris] insisted her ‘values have not changed,’ but the only thing we know about her values is her record as a lefty California Democrat and her choice of impeccably-progressive Walz as her running mate. She still doesn’t have a policy section on her campaign website. And the centerpiece of the ‘economic plan’ she announced just before the Democratic convention was price controls — which, when pretty much everyone dumped on the idea, her campaign quickly announced are not a major policy.”
Editorial Board, New York Post
“Bash asked Harris if she still wanted to ban fracking, a policy she repeatedly proclaimed in 2019. Harris claimed she made clear on the debate stage in 2020 that ‘I would not ban fracking.’ It is true that in a debate against then-Vice President Mike Pence, Harris said, ‘Joe Biden will not end fracking. He has been very clear about that.’ But that is a statement of Biden’s policy, not hers…
“Harris’s dishonesty was further exposed when she tried to explain her shift on fracking. She said the Inflation Reduction Act convinced her that climate change could be addressed without banning fracking. But the Inflation Reduction Act was passed two years after her debate with Pence. It can’t be the reason she flip-flopped on fracking because it hadn’t happened yet! The reality is that as Harris said repeatedly on Thursday, her ‘values have not changed.’”
Editorial Board, Washington Examiner
“On immigration, Harris simply did not account for her actions that helped the Biden administration admit more than 7 million unvetted illegal border crossers and allow them to stay in the U.S. Instead, she said her work on addressing the ‘root causes’ of migration from the Northern Triangle ‘has actually resulted in a number of benefits, including historic investments by American businesses in that region.’ It’s not clear that the people facing the migration crisis will be cheered that Harris persuaded more American companies to invest in Guatemala…
“Harris sort of addressed her earlier position that illegal border crossings should be decriminalized. Now, Harris says, ‘I believe there should be consequence’ for crossing the border illegally. She did not say what that consequence should be. But she did claim that she is uniquely qualified to handle the problem because she ‘prosecuted transnational criminal organizations’ and ‘served a border state as attorney general.’ She did not say why that experience is superior to her opponent, who as president dramatically reduced illegal border crossings.”
Byron York, Washington Examiner
“The vice president’s handlers have good reason to keep her away from questioning, because when push comes to shove, she doesn’t have good answers for why she hasn’t enacted any of her current proposals during her time in office, or why she’s changed her old positions. Nor does Tim Walz have any good answers for why he keeps saying things about himself that aren’t true. This is a campaign built on vibes, and it will remain a campaign built on vibes.”
Jim Geraghty, National Review